Multifocal, Asymmetric Bilateral Primary Aldosteronism Cannot be Excluded by Strong Adrenal Vein Sampling Lateralization: An International Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Primary aldosteronism (PA) has been broadly dichotomized into unilateral and bilateral forms. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) lateralization indices (LI) ≥2 to 4 are the standard-of-care to recommend unilateral adrenalectomy for presumed unilateral PA. We aimed to assess the rates and characteristics of residual PA after AVS-guided adrenalectomy. METHODS: We conducted an international, retrospective, cohort study of patients with PA from 7 referral centers who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy based on LI≥4 on baseline and/or cosyntropin-stimulated AVS. Aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) immunohistochemistry and next generation sequencing were performed on available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded adrenal tissue. RESULTS: The cohort included 283 patients who underwent AVS-guided adrenalectomy, followed for a median of 326 days postoperatively. Lack of PA cure was observed in 16% of consecutive patients, and in 22 patients with lateralized PA on both baseline and cosyntropin-stimulated AVS. Among patients with residual PA postoperatively, 73% had multiple CYP11B2 positive areas within the resected adrenal tissue (versus 23% in those cured), wherein CACNA1D mutations were most prevalent (63% versus 33% in those cured). In adjusted regression models, independent predictors of postoperative residual PA included Black versus White race (odds ratio, 5.10 [95% CI, 1.45-17.86]), AVS lateralization only at baseline (odds ratio, 8.93 [95% CI 3.00-26.32] versus both at baseline and after cosyntropin stimulation), and CT-AVS disagreement (odds ratio, 2.75 [95% CI, 1.20-6.31]). CONCLUSIONS: Multifocal, asymmetrical bilateral PA is relatively common, and it cannot be excluded by robust AVS lateralization. Long-term postoperative monitoring should be routinely pursued, to identify residual PA and afford timely initiation of targeted medical therapy.

Imaging Concordance With Vein Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism: A Cohort Study and Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is used to distinguish unilateral from bilateral aldosterone hypersecretion as a cause of primary aldosteronism (PA). Unilateral disease is treated with adrenalectomy and bilateral hypersecretion managed medically. METHODS: We performed a single institution retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing adrenalectomy for PA from July 2013 to June 2022. Concordance of imaging findings with AVS was evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed with Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared Fisher's exact. Literature review performed via triple method search strategy. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent AVS and adrenalectomy for PA. Two patients did not have imaging findings and 19 were localized with an adenoma. For patients with image localization, AVS was concordant in nine, discordant in four, and nondiagnostic in six. For patients with discordant findings, age range was 35.8 to 72.4 y compared with concordant patient age range of 49.8 to 71.7 y. Overall discordance between imaging results and AVS was 40%. The aldosterone level was associated with concordance with a median of 52 ng/dL compared with 26 ng/dL if discordant (P = 0.002). There was a significant reduction in antihypertensive medications for the entire cohort from a median of three medications (interquartile range 2-4) to 1 medication (interquartile range 1-2), P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, 40% of patients with selective AVS had discordant imaging and AVS results. Aldosterone level was associated with concordance. Hypertension was significantly improved with a median decrease of two antihypertensives. Our results support performance of AVS on all candidates for adrenalectomy for PA.

Adrenal Vein Sampling: Does the Location of the Non-adrenal Venous Sample Matter?

PURPOSE: Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is used to lateralise and differentiate unilateral from bilateral aldosterone production in primary aldosteronism. The adrenal venous samples are standardised to a peripheral or low inferior vena cava (IVC) sample and compared. It is unknown whether the location of the non-adrenal sample affects the results. This study compares AVS results standardised to the low IVC and right external iliac vein (REIV). METHODS: Patients who underwent AVS between March 2021 and May 2023 were included. All procedures were undertaken by a single operator (AA). Demographic data and AVS results were collected from patients' electronic records. Catheterisation success and lateralisation were assessed using both low IVC and REIV samples. Equivalence test was used to compare the cortisol and aldosterone levels. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients, (M: F = 38:43), aged between 29 and 74 were included. Bilateral successful adrenal vein cannulation was achieved in 79/81 (97.5%) cases. The mean cortisol levels from the REIV were statistically equivalent although there was a small and not biologically significant difference from the low IVC (respective geometric means 183 nmol/l vs. 185 nmol/l, p = 0.015). This small difference in cortisol may be due to accessory adrenal venous drainage into the IVC. The aldosterone and aldosterone/cortisol ratios were statistically equivalent. There was no discordance in selectivity or lateralisation when the IVC or REIV measurements were used. CONCLUSION: The IVC and REIV samples may be used interchangeably during AVS.

Diagnostic consistency between computed tomography and adrenal vein sampling of primary aldosteronism: leading to successful curative outcome after adrenalectomy; a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Adrenal computed tomography (CT) is a useful tool for locating adrenal lesion in primary aldosteronism (PA) patients. However, adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is considered as a gold standard for subtype diagnosis of PA. The aim of this study was to investigate the consistency of CT and AVS for the diagnosis of PA subtypes and evaluate the concordance of surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 264 PA patients having both CT and AVS. Diagnostic consistency between CT and AVS was accessed, and clinical and biochemical outcomes were evaluated at 6 months after adrenalectomy. RESULTS: Of all, 207 (78%) had a CT unilateral lesion, 31 (12%) CT bilateral lesion, and 26 (10%) CT bilateral normal findings. Among the CT unilateral lesion group, 138 (67%) had ipsilateral AVS lateralization. For CT bilateral lesion and bilateral normal, AVS unilateral lateralization was found in 17 (55%) and 2 (8%), respectively. The consistency between CT lesion and AVS lateralization including CT unilateral with AVS ipsilateral, and CT bilateral lesion with AVS bilateral patients was 63.8% (152/238). Of 77 patients with available data out of 138 patients who underwent adrenalectomy with consistency between CT and AVS, the clinical success rate was 96%, for 17 inconsistency patients out of 22 patients who underwent adrenalectomy, the clinical success rate was 94% after adrenalectomy following the lateralization result of AVS. CONCLUSION: CT is a useful tool to diagnose the adrenal lesion in PA patients. However, AVS is more sufficient to detect the unilateral PA subtype, which could provide curable treatment to surgical candidates of PA such that AVS can identify patients with contralateral PA in CT unilateral lesion and unilateral PA in CT bilateral lesion. The surgical outcome was successful when an adrenalectomy was performed according to the AVS lateralization result.

A cadaveric anatomical study of the adrenals: vascular relationship.

The adrenal gland is a retroperitoneal organ with intimate relationships with neighboring organs but also with the large retroperitoneal vessels. Our aim was to study the vascular relationships of the adrenal gland with the large abdominal vessels. Our work is an anatomical dissection of 80 fresh cadaveric adrenals. The subjects didn't have a history of retroperitoneal surgery. Dissection conditions were similar to those in the living. All measurements were made in situ. On the right side, the average distance between the adrenal gland and the renal vein (DR) was 13 mm (0-20). In one case, the adrenal gland laid directly on the right renal vein (DR = 0). The average length L, over which the right adrenal gland entered behind the inferior vena cava (IVC), was 8 mm (0-12). In 4 cases, the right adrenal was lateral to the IVC and in 6 cases the length L exceeded 10 mm. On the left side, the mean distance DL, separating the adrenal gland from the left renal vein was 8 mm with extremes ranging from 0 mm to 18 mm. In eleven cases, the adrenal gland laid directly on the left renal vein. The right adrenal gland has a close relationship with the IVC and is often located behind it. This close relationship helps to explain the increased incidence of IVC lesions during surgery. The left adrenal gland has an intimate relationship with the left renal vein and often lies on top of it. This explains the risk of injury to the left renal pedicle during left adrenal surgery.

Treatment decision based on unilateral index from nonadrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated and adrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism.

OBJECTIVE: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is recommended for identifying the subtype of primary aldosteronism before making a surgical treatment decision, but failed cannulation of one adrenal vein is common. To evaluate whether using results of one adrenal vein during AVS could accurately predict unilateral primary aldosteronism. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in primary aldosteronism patients receiving bilaterally or unilaterally successful AVS. The aldosterone-cortisol ratio from the adrenal vein divided by the aldosterone-cortisol ratio from the inferior vena cava (IVC) was calculated as the AV/IVC index. RESULTS: The study examined 455 patients with primary aldosteronism, including 347 patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism. Among them, 250 and 125 patients received non- adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and ACTH-stimulated AVS, respectively, and 80 patients received both forms of AVS. Under non-ACTH-stimulated AVS, AUC of the AV/IVC index to diagnose ipsilateral and contralateral primary aldosteronism were 0.778 and 0.924, respectively. The specificity was 100% for both, with sensitivities of 5 and 26%, respectively, when using cutoffs of 17.05 to diagnose ipsilateral primary aldosteronism and 0.15 to diagnose contralateral primary aldosteronism. When using cutoffs of 3.60 and 0.70, the specificity decreased, but if combined with CT results (ipsilateral or contralateral adrenal nodules larger than 10 mm), the specificity could be maintained at 99%, with sensitivities of 33 and 45%, respectively. Under ACTH-stimulated AVS, the AV/IVC index showed similar accuracy to diagnose ipsilateral and contralateral primary aldosteronism. CONCLUSION: The unilateral AV/IVC index can be used to diagnose unilateral primary aldosteronism during AVS. Combining CT results can increase the accuracy further.

Predicting Bilateral Subtypes of Primary Aldosteronism Without Adrenal Vein Sampling: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common endocrine cause of hypertension. The final diagnostic step involves subtyping, using adrenal vein sampling (AVS), to determine if PA is unilateral or bilateral. The complete PA diagnostic process is time and resource intensive, which can impact rates of diagnosis and treatment. Previous studies have developed tools to predict bilateral PA before AVS. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of published tools that aim to identify bilateral subtypes of PA. METHODS: Medline and Embase databases were searched to identify published models that sought to subtype PA, and algorithms to predict bilateral PA are reported. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were then performed. RESULTS: There were 35 studies included, evaluating 55 unique algorithms to predict bilateral PA. The algorithms were grouped into 6 categories: those combining biochemical, radiological, and demographic characteristics (A); confirmatory testing alone or combined with biochemical, radiological, and demographic characteristics (B); biochemistry results alone (C); adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation testing (D); anatomical imaging (E); and functional imaging (F). Across the identified algorithms, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 5% to 100% and 36% to 100%, respectively. Meta-analysis of 30 unique predictive tools from 32 studies showed that the group A algorithms had the highest specificity for predicting bilateral PA, while group F had the highest sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the variability in published predictive algorithms, they are likely important for decision-making regarding the value of AVS. Prospective validation may enable medical treatment upfront for people with a high likelihood of bilateral PA without the need for an invasive and resource-intensive test.

Intraprocedural Cortisol Measurement Increases Adrenal Vein Cannulation Success Rate in Primary Aldosteronism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of intraprocedural cortisol measurement (IPCM) for the technical success rates of bilateral adrenal vein, right adrenal vein (RAV), and left adrenal vein (LAV) cannulation during adrenal vein sampling (AVS). METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were performed from database inception to May 10, 2023, without any restrictions. We estimated the overall effect estimates of outcomes using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. We conducted subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analysis to explore the possible sources of between-study heterogeneity. RESULTS: In total, 3,485 patients from 11 studies (three prospective and eight retrospective) were enrolled. Bilateral selectivity in patients who underwent IPCM during AVS was significantly higher than that in patients who underwent a routine AVS procedure (84% vs. 64%, RR 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-1.59, P < 0.01), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 68%). A 42% relative risk reduction in the failure rate of bilateral adrenal vein cannulation was found in the IPCM group. Moreover, pooled analysis showed a significant increase in the success rates of RAV cannulation (84% vs. 72%, RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.12-1.31, P < 0.01, I2 = 33%) and LAV cannulation (89% vs. 84%, RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, P < 0.01, I2 = 4%) when IPCM was implemented during the AVS procedure compared to the routine AVS procedure. CONCLUSIONS: An IPCM-based strategy during AVS appears to have a significant beneficial effect on improving the success rate of bilateral cannulation, RAV cannulation and LAV cannulation.

Feasibility of spectral CT-derived extracellular volume fraction for differentiating aldosterone-producing from nonfunctioning adrenal nodules.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of spectral CT-derived extracellular volume (ECV) for differentiating aldosterone-producing nodules (APN) from nonfunctioning adrenal nodules (NFN). METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with biochemically and histologically confirmed unilateral APN (34) and NFN (35) as well as 23 patients with bilateral APN (19) and NFN (27) confirmed biochemically and by adrenal vein sampling (AVS) were enrolled in this retrospective study from October 2020 to April 2022. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced spectral CT of the adrenal glands with a 10-min delayed phase. The haematocrit level was measured within 2 days of CT. An iodine density map was derived from the delayed CT. The ECV fractions of the APN and NFN were calculated and compared in the test cohort of 69 patients with unilateral adrenal nodules. The optimal cut-off value was determined to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the ECV fraction for differentiating APN from NFN in the validation cohort of 23 patients with bilateral adrenal nodules. RESULTS: The ECV fractions of the APN (11.17 ± 4.57%) were significantly lower (p < 0.001) than that of the NFN (24.79 ± 6.01%) in the test cohort. At cut-off ECV value of 17.16%, the optimal area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.974 (95% confidence interval: 0.942-1) with 91.4% sensitivity, 93.9% specificity, and 92.8% accuracy in the test cohort and 89.5% sensitivity, 96.3% specificity, and 93.5% accuracy in the validation cohort for differentiating APN from NFN. CONCLUSION: The spectral CT-derived ECV fraction can differentiate APN from NFN with high diagnostic performance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Spectral CT-derived extracellular volume fraction could accurately differentiate between adrenal aldosterone-producing nodules and nonfunctioning nodules. It might serve as a noninvasive alternative to adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism patients with bilateral adrenal nodules. KEY POINTS: • Conventional CT cannot differentiate aldosterone-producing adrenal nodules from nonfunctioning nodules. • Extracellular volume of adrenal aldosterone-producing nodules was significantly lower than that of nonfunctioning nodules and normal adrenal glands. It can accurately differentiate between aldosterone-producing and nonfunctioning adrenal nodules. • Extracellular volume may be a novel, noninvasive biomarker alternative to adrenal vein sampling for determining the functional status of bilateral adrenal nodules in patients with primary aldosteronism.

Multiple radiologist review of adrenal CT still frequently misses lateralized surgical primary aldosteronism.

Patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) have increased morbidity and mortality compared to those with essential hypertension. Accurate detection of lateralized PA is important so that affected patients can receive potentially curative adrenalectomy. However, around 40% of patients with lateralized PA have "normal" adrenal glands on computed tomography (CT). Additional independent review of imaging has been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy in many areas of imaging. Therefore, the authors sought to establish if multi-reader re-assessment of previously reported normal CT scans would result in increased detection of surgically remediable disease. The authors found that re-assessment of CT imaging by one, two, or three additional radiologists (or a combination thereof) slightly increased the detection of lateralized disease, but these differences were not statistically significant (p > .05). Readers had low inter-observer agreement (kappa = 0.17). If detection of a discrete nodule on CT was made a prerequisite for adrenal vein sampling (AVS), a second read by another reviewer would still result in an excess of missed cases (84.2%, 36.8%, and 65.8%, respectively, for each of the three independent reviewers). Therefore, a "normal" CT does not preclude the possibility of lateralized PA. Adrenal vein sampling should still be strongly considered wherever available and whenever surgery is considered for treatment of PA, irrespective of CT findings.

Success Rate of Adrenal Venous Sampling and its Determining Factors: Experience of a Single Center in Malaysia.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperaldosteronism has been regarded as the commonest and potentially curable cause of secondary hypertension in up to 80% of cases if this condition is detected early. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy proved to be a promising curable method for primary hyperaldosteronism secondary to aldosterone producing adenoma, while primary hyperaldosteronism secondary to bilateral adrenal hyperplasia requires optimization of medical treatment. Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) has been recommended by the Endocrine Society's guideline in addressing the subtypes of primary hyperaldosteronism. Therefore, determining success rate of AVS in our center is crucial in the management of primary hyperaldosteronism and to prevent redundant procedures. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the success rate of AVS in our center and the associated factors that correlate with the success rate. METHODS: A retrospective study in a single center, all adult patients who were diagnosed with primary hyperaldosteronism and underwent AVS in our center between 2014 until 2022 were included. Successful samples defined by a selectivity index of ≥2, that is, the ratio of adrenal vein cortisol level to the peripheral vein cortisol level, were evaluated. The baseline demographic characteristics of each patient, technical parameters of AVS, and anatomical parameters of right adrenal vein from the venographic images were evaluated and analyzed to correlate with the outcome of AVS. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The overall success rate of AVS in our center was 61.3%. The success rate significantly increased to 80.6% in the trained interventional radiologist (IR) group, which represents a single IR who had completed specific training in AVS, compared to non-trained IR group which consisted of a total of 10 IRs without specific AVS training (P = 0.046). The right AVS had lower success rate than the left AVS (64% vs. 94.6%). The type of right adrenal vein pattern showed significant association with the outcome of AVS (P = 0.014). There were 6 types of right adrenal vein patterns observed in our study; Type 1 - gland-like pattern with numerous branches, Type 2 - delta pattern, Type 3 - triangular pattern with central "blush", Type 4 - no discernible pattern and Type 5 - spidery or stellate pattern. The sixth pattern was the hepatic radicles blush with hepatic drainage, for which blood sampling were also collected due to its appearance was frequently indistinguishable from the Type 1 pattern. The results showed Type 2 pattern had the highest incidence (30.5%; 32/105 samples) and Type 5 had the highest success rate (100%; 11/11 samples), while the hepatic radicles blush pattern had the highest incidence in fail samples resulting in the highest failure rate (94.7%; 18/19 samples). The visualization of the inferior emissary vein (IEV) from the venographic images during right AVS had a significant association with the successful AVS (97.5% success rate; 39/40 samples; P = 0.003). Contrariwise, blood sampling withdrawn from the right adrenal vein in the presence of hepatic drainage communication associated with the failure AVS (86.7% failure rate; 26/30 samples; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The overall success rate of both AVS in our center was 61.3%, and the success rate was higher in the trained IR group than the non-trained IR group. The visualization of IEV and the type of right adrenal vein patterns were the key determining factors with significant association to the successful right AVS. Conversely, blood sampling withdrawn from the hepatic radicles and hepatic drainage had significant association with the failure right AVS.

A clinical assessment of portable point-of-care testing for quick cortisol assay during adrenal vein sampling.

This study assessed the clinical performance of point-of-care testing (POCT) for quick cortisol assay (QCA) during adrenal vein sampling (AVS) using a newly invented portable quantitative assay instrument. An observational study was conducted prospectively at two centres in Japan. Forty-eight patients with primary aldosteronism considered for adrenalectomy were enrolled in this study and underwent AVS. Three basal adrenal vein samples from each adrenal vein and two from the inferior vena cava were collected sequentially. The cortisol concentration of adrenal vein samples was measured by routine method and QCA. A total of 338 adrenal vein samples were analysed from 250 sites to determine AVS success or failure. The distribution of turnaround time of the QCA for AVS success or failure followed a normal distribution with an average of 20.5 min. A positive correlation between the routine method and QCA was observed regarding cortisol concentration or selectivity index. No significant difference between the two methods was observed regarding the success rate of AVS. Using the routine method as a reference, the sensitivity and specificity of AVS success or failure were 99.1% (210/212) and 81.6% (31/38), respectively. Easy, quick, portable, and precise POCT-QCA demonstrated its compatibility with routine methods regarding clinical performance.

Transvenous Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for an Aldosterone-Producing Tumor of the Left Adrenal Gland: A First in Human Case Report.

PURPOSE: To describe a novel technique of transvenous radiofrequency catheter ablation of an aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) of the left adrenal gland using the GOS System (Japan Lifeline, Tokyo, Japan). Using the GOS system, a flexible radiofrequency tip catheter can be inserted into the adrenal central and tributary veins, the drainers for functional tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An APA at the left adrenal gland, which was diagnosed by segmental adrenal venous sampling following administration of 0.25 mg cosyntropin, was ablated using the GOS catheter inserted into adrenal tributary veins via a right femoral vein 7-Fr sheath. The effect of radiofrequency ablation on APA was assessed using the international consensus on surgical outcomes for unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA). RESULTS: No device-related complications were observed. The patient was deeply sedated under blood pressure and heart rate control with continuous administration of ß-blockers. Then, the tumor and surrounding adrenal gland were cauterized at 7000 J two times each in sequence. The output time was 7-11 min for each ablation and 80 min in total. For blood pressure and pulse rate control, esmolol hydrochloride and phentolamine mesylate were used. The contrast enhancement of APA disappeared on dynamic CT immediately after the procedure. PA was biochemically cured until 12 months after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Using the radiofrequency device with the GOS catheter and system is a method for cauterizing adrenal tumors from blood vessels. This approach resulted in a marked reduction in aldosterone concentrations and a complete biochemical cure of PA over the observation period.

The left adrenal vein: An important direction for right adrenal venous sampling.

This study aimed to evaluate the guiding role of left adrenal vein (LAV) for right adrenal venous sampling (AVS). A total of 347 patients who were diagnosed with primary aldosteronism (PA) and underwent successful AVS procedures from January 2020 to July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different quadrant position of the orifice of right adrenal vein (RAV), the area where the orifice of RAV is located is divided into three areas: A, B, and C and the area A is further subdivided into A1, A2, and A3 areas. By counting the area where the orifice of RAV is located, the guiding role of the LAV on the RAV is determined. Most of the orifice of RAV are located in area A, and the proportions of areas A, B, and C was 96.8%, 1.4%, and 1.7%, respectively. In area A, areas A1, A2, and A3 account for 80.9%, 17.0%, and 2.1%, respectively. High body mass index, female and smaller the angle between the LAV and horizontal line was associated with the closer positional relationship between the LAV on the RAV. These findings suggest that most of the horizontal position of the RAV orifice is close to the horizontal position of the most distal end of the LAV, which indicate that the LAV location can play an important role on the guiding for right AVS. Additionally, body mass index, sex, and the angle of the LAV was largely related to location of the orifice of the RAV.

Corticotropin Stimulation in Adrenal Venous Sampling for Patients With Primary Aldosteronism: The ADOPA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is usually recommended to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) before definitive surgical or medical treatment is offered. Whether a treatment decision based on AVS with or without corticotropin (ACTH) stimulation leads to different biochemical and clinical remission rates in patients with PA remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate whether treatment decisions based on AVS with or without ACTH stimulation lead to different biochemical and clinical remission rates in patients with PA. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted at a tertiary hospital in China from July 8, 2020, to February 20, 2023, among patients with PA aged 18 to 70 years. Patients were followed up for 12 months after the initiation of treatment. An intention-to-diagnose analysis was conducted. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either ACTH-stimulated or non-ACTH-stimulated AVS. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the proportion of patients with complete biochemical remission after 12 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who achieved complete clinical remission after 12 months of follow-up, dosages of antihypertensive agents, rate of successful bilateral AVS, and adverse events. Results: Of 228 patients with PA, 115 were randomized to the non-ACTH-stimulated group (median age, 50.0 years [IQR, 41.0-57.0 years]; 70 males [60.9%]) and 113 to the ACTH-stimulated group (median age, 50.0 years [IQR, 43.5-56.5 years]; 63 males [55.8%]). A total of 68 patients (59.1%) underwent adrenalectomy in the non-ACTH group and 65 (57.5%) in the ACTH group. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with complete biochemical remission who were managed on the basis of AVS with vs without ACTH stimulation (with: 56 of 113 [49.6%]; without: 59 of 115 [51.3%]; P = .79). There also was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who achieved complete clinical remission between the non-ACTH and ACTH groups (26 of 115 [22.6%] and 31 of 113 [27.4%], respectively; P = .40). The intensity of therapy with antihypertensives, successful catheterization of bilateral adrenal veins, and incidence of adverse events did not significantly differ between the non-ACTH and ACTH groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this RCT, treatment of PA on the basis of non-ACTH-stimulated or ACTH-stimulated AVS did not lead to significant differences in clinical outcomes for the patients. These results suggest that ACTH stimulation during AVS may not have clinical benefit, at least in the Chinese population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04461535.

Diagnostic performance of the adrenal vein to inferior vena cava aldosterone ratio in classifying the subtype of primary aldosteronism.

Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is the standard procedure for distinguishing unilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) from bilateral PA. In cases where only one adrenal vein is successfully cannulated, it has been suggested that subtype classification can be determined based on the ratio of the concentration of aldosterone between the adrenal vein and the inferior vena cava (AV/IVC index). However, diagnostic performance of the ipsilateral versus contralateral AV/IVC index in predicting lateralization has not been directly compared. In a retrospective cohort of 133 patients with confirmed PA who underwent successful AVS, the performance of the AV/IVC index to predict laterality was evaluated and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves was calculated. In detecting left unilateral PA (n = 47), the AUROC of the right AV/IVC index (RAV/IVC) was significantly higher than the AUROC of the left AV/IVC (LAV/IVC) index (0.967 vs. 0.871, p = 0.008). In detecting right unilateral PA (n = 30), the AUROC of the LAV/IVC index tended to be higher than that of the RAV/IVC index, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (0.966 vs. 0.906, p = 0.08). In detecting left unilateral PA, the sensitivities of the RAV/IVC and LAV/IVC indices were 83% and 46%, respectively, while the specificities of both were above 90%. In detecting right unilateral PA, the sensitivities of the LAV/IVC and RAV/IVC indices were 80% and 43%, respectively, while the specificities of both were above 90%. The AV/IVC index has superior diagnostic performance in detecting contralateral unilateral PA compared to ipsilateral unilateral PA.

Differences between left adrenal vein sampling sites revealed with segmental sampling in primary aldosteronism.

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the differences between two left sampling sites (left adrenal central vein [LCV] and common trunk [CMT], conjunction with LCV and inferior phrenic vein) and their impact on adrenal venous sampling (AVS) in primary aldosteronism by analyzing the results of segmental AVS (sAVS). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a final cohort of 432 patients who underwent cosyntropin-stimulated sAVS from 2017 to 2020. Hormone levels in the LCV and the CMT were compared. Subtype diagnosis was based on the lateralization index with LCV and CMT sampling (a cutoff value of 4) and sAVS after excluding patients with a selectivity index (SI) <3. RESULTS: Compared with the LCV, CMT sampling showed significantly lower aldosterone and cortisol levels and a higher proportion of cases with an SI of <3 (2.8% vs 0.5%, p = 0.025) and <5 (6.9% vs 0.5%, p < 0.001), while the aldosterone-to-cortisol ratio and the lateralization index were not significantly different. Subtyping of both sites was concordant in 94.7% (393/415) and discordant in the remainder, which included left and right aldosterone-producing adenoma and idiopathic hyperaldosteronism cases referring to the sAVS. There was no significant difference between the concordance rate of the two sampling sites based on the sAVS diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: LCV sampling meets the SI criteria for successful AVS more frequently compared with CMT sampling, but neither was better than the other in terms of diagnosis under conditions of meeting the criteria. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: LCV sampling would decrease the number of cases judged as AVS failure.

Utility of Carbon Dioxide Venography and Intraprocedural CT for Adrenal Venous Sampling in Patients with an Allergy to Iodinated Contrast Media.

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of carbon dioxide (CO2) and intraprocedural unenhanced computed tomography (CT) for adrenal venous sampling (AVS) (CO2-intraprocedural unenhanced CT-AVS) in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) and a history of iodine contrast medium allergy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CO2-intraprocedural unenhanced CT-AVS was performed in 18 patients with iodine contrast media allergies at the authors' hospital between December 2015 and January 2021. CT and noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography were used to evaluate the preoperative adrenal vein anatomy. CO2 venography was performed to confirm adrenal vein catheterization. Additionally, intraprocedural unenhanced CT was also performed to confirm catheter position in the right adrenal gland. RESULTS: In all cases in which CO2-intraprocedural unenhanced CT-AVS was performed, the right and left adrenal veins were catheterized appropriately, leading to a localized diagnosis. Catheterization of the left adrenal vein was confirmed using CO2 venography in all cases. In 7 of the 18 cases, CO2 venography demonstrated selection of the right adrenal vein. In 15 of 18 cases, intraprocedural unenhanced CT demonstrated selection of the right adrenal vein. CONCLUSIONS: CO2-intraprocedural unenhanced CT-AVS demonstrated the same diagnostic ability for PA localization as conventional AVS with iodine contrast media. The proposed method is clinically feasible for AVS, in which iodine contrast media use is restricted.